tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, August 10th, 3:18PM

News

rss
Latest Headlines

Power plugs holes in financial adviser legislation

Commerce Minister Simon Power has plugged some of the holes in the financial adviser legislation, announcing cabinet sign-off to allow groups of related companies to register as qualifying financial entities (QFEs).

Thursday, May 6th 2010, 10:09PM 1 Comment

by Paul McBeth

 

The government's recommendations have been sent to the Commerce Select Committee.

Power said the QFE model was "too inflexible to accommodate certain legitimate business models", and that it was appropriate for the related companies to "collectively take responsibility for the specific entities in their group."

The Ministry of Economic Development estimates compliance costs for QFEs will reduce the number of authorised financial advisers (AFAs) firms need to employ, with savings as high as $3 million for the largest entities, according to its regulatory impact statement.

The MED said it was possible that "this proposal will create an incentive for independent financial advisers to join a QFE to avoid their obligation to train and to avoid the cost of authorisation," but this was offset by the "significant marketing advantage" for financial advisers who are not tied to QFEs, and the wider scope of services on offer from AFAs, including financial planning, to make them more competitive.

To allay concerns around this area, Power said the Securities Commission will apply an ‘if not, why not' policy for advisers in QFEs, to ensure non-AFAs meet the same standards from the Code of Conduct as if they were authorised.

Cabinet also agreed to reduce the obligations on advisers to wholesale clients, allow companies to issue generic advice through brochures and increase the Securities Commission's and Commerce Minister's ability to grant exemptions.

"These amendments will target the regime in the areas of the financial adviser industry that are most in need of increased oversight, will allow firms to provide advice efficiently, and will future-proof the regime," Power said in a statement.

"We need to ensure that those people who do not need the comprehensive protection of the regime are not unduly burdened, while minimising the risk that the definition creates a loophole for the unscrupulous," he said.

Parliament's Commerce Committee began hearing submissions on the legislation to amend the Financial Advisers Act on Thursday.

 

Paul is a staff writer for Good Returns based in Wellington.

« Open Polytech puts off assessing ‘Standard C’ for nowCommerce Committee Chair has misgivings about QFE extension »

Special Offers

Comments from our readers

On 7 May 2010 at 9:18 am Bazza said:
To OFE or not QFE that is the question... Good to see the rules keep changing in favour of the large entities, (read banks), who can actually most afford the costs of regulation. Long live the AFA's...
Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
News Bites
Latest Comments
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “@Murray: The reps seemed to be acting on their personal interests rather than the interests of advisers. Conflict of interest,...”
    7 days ago by w k
  • KiwiSaver funds shake off Middle East tension
    “In this recent presentation of mine https://www.knowrisk.co.nz I show that the average Balanced KiwiSaver fund has added...”
    7 days ago by P Urbani
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “@pragmatic The most elegant description of what you are talking about was retired Chief Justice of Australia speaking at...”
    8 days ago by Murray D Weatherston
  • Are we doing right by our clients when it comes to TPD?
    “Great article, Kat. The problem is that none of this feels real to people until it is. I'm as guilty as anyone. Death...”
    8 days ago by Own Occupation
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “There is real heat in the criticism aimed at the regulator, but it is pointed at the wrong target. The serious charge is...”
    8 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Mortgage Rates Newsletter

Daily Weekly

Previous News

MORE NEWS»

Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com