tmmonline.nz  |   landlords.co.nz        About Good Returns  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  RSS Feeds

NZ's Financial Adviser News Centre

GR Logo
Last Article Uploaded: Monday, August 10th, 3:18PM

Insurance

rss
Latest Headlines

Court of Appeal reserves decision on Tower ANZ battle

The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on the legal battle between ANZ National and Tower Insurance over $70 million of premium income.  

Thursday, April 1st 2010, 1:39PM

The battle is for insurance ownership of 110,000 customers representing 196,000 general insurance policies.

Tower provided fire and general insurance products to the ANZ and National Bank of New Zealand for 15 years and this allowed Tower to benefit from the ANZ National Bank brands and to access to its 1.2 million customers.

The benefit ANZ National Bank had from the arrangement was the ability to offer a one-stop insurance service as well as a commission for each policy sold with a share in Tower's profits.

But in 2005 ANZ National decided to take on Vero as its new general insurance products underwriter and the agreement with Tower was terminated.

ANZ National Bank claims Tower could continue to administer the existing policies until they came up for the annual renewal, but could not renew them.

However, Tower has refused to give up control of the customers signed up under the old agreement which make up about a third of its premium income.

Tower has continued to renew policies as they fall due using the bank's insurance brands, ANZ Cover and National Bank Master Cover.

In March last year the High Court ruled in Tower's favour, saying that when Tower sold a policy to a bank customer, the customer also became a Tower customer.

BusinessDay reported that much of the argument was around how key clauses in the agreement should be interpreted.

Court of Appeal president Sir William Young repeatedly criticised the standard of the wording in the documents and said "it is possibly a waste of time to try and make sense of the agreement".

Justice Susan Glazebrook said the agreement's failure to spell out explicitly how existing policies were to be dealt with on renewal after the alliance ended meant the court was not going to find "a smoking gun" to indicate which side was in the right.

 

« Sovereign takes advantage of medical advancementsMixed reviews from advisers on FMA regulation »

Special Offers

Commenting is closed

 

print

Printable version  

print

Email to a friend
Insurance Briefs

AIA adds grocery discounts to Vitality
AIA New Zealand has added a healthy food benefit to its Vitality programme, giving eligible insurance customers discounts of up to 25% on fresh fruit and vegetables at Woolworths.

Intelligent claims management platform arrives
Simfuni launches intelligent claims management product, future-proofing life insurers for the AI automation era.

Spurs and Auckand FC to meet in Auckland
AIA NZ is the Major Partner for Tottenham Hotspur’s return to New Zealand, with the team set to face Auckland FC at Eden Park later this year.

Fidelity Life keeps its rating for another year.
Fidelity Life has once again had its A- (Excellent) financial strength rating affirmed by AM Best.

News Bites
Latest Comments
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “@Murray: The reps seemed to be acting on their personal interests rather than the interests of advisers. Conflict of interest,...”
    8 days ago by w k
  • KiwiSaver funds shake off Middle East tension
    “In this recent presentation of mine https://www.knowrisk.co.nz I show that the average Balanced KiwiSaver fund has added...”
    9 days ago by P Urbani
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “@pragmatic The most elegant description of what you are talking about was retired Chief Justice of Australia speaking at...”
    10 days ago by Murray D Weatherston
  • Are we doing right by our clients when it comes to TPD?
    “Great article, Kat. The problem is that none of this feels real to people until it is. I'm as guilty as anyone. Death...”
    10 days ago by Own Occupation
  • FMA CEO on leave
    “There is real heat in the criticism aimed at the regulator, but it is pointed at the wrong target. The serious charge is...”
    10 days ago by Pragmatic
Subscribe Now

Cover Notes - Specific news aimed at risk advisers

Previous News
Most Commented On
About Us  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds  |  Letters  |  Archive  |  Toolbox  |  Disclaimer
 
Site by Web Developer and eyelovedesign.com
x